• J Hosp Med · Sep 2016

    The risk-outcome-experience triad: Mortality risk and the hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey.

    • Mark E Cowen, Jennifer Czerwinski, Jared Kabara, David U Blumenthal, Susan Kheder, and Stefanie Simmons.
    • Department of Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan. mark.cowen@stjoeshealth.org.
    • J Hosp Med. 2016 Sep 1; 11 (9): 628-35.

    BackgroundStudies have shown an association between the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey (HCAHPS) scores and clinical quality. The mortality risk on admission predicts adverse events. It is not known if this risk also portends a suboptimal patient experience.ObjectiveTo determine if the admission mortality risk identifies an experience of care risk.DesignA retrospectively assembled cohort in which individual HCAHPS survey responses were linked to the admission risk of dying.SettingFive community hospitals of various sizes in Michigan.PatientsThere were 17,509 HCAHPS medical and surgical respondents; 2513 (14.4%) were at high risk of dying.MeasurementsOdds ratio (OR) (high-risk patients to low-risk patients) for providing a top box score for HCAHPS dimensions, controlling for hospital and the standard HCAHPS patient mix adjustment factors.ResultsHigh-risk respondents were less likely to provide the most favorable response (unadjusted) for all HCAHPS domains, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.09) for discharge information. Multivariable analyses indicated that high-risk patients were less likely to report a top box experience for doctor communication (OR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.94) and responsiveness of hospital staff (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.85), but were more likely to have received adequate discharge information (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.48).ConclusionsPatients at high risk of dying who completed surveys were less likely to report favorable physician communication and staff responsiveness. Further understanding of these relationships may help design a care model to improve both outcomes and experience. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:628-635. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.© 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.