• Selena Knight, Benedict Wj Hayhoe, Lucy Frith, Mark Ashworth, Imran Sajid, and Andrew Papanikitas.
• King's College London, School of Population Health Sciences, London.
• Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jan 1; 70 (690): e45-e54.

BackgroundClinical commissioning involves ethically challenging decisions about health resource allocation. However, commissioners come from a range of professional backgrounds with varying levels of training and expertise in ethical decision-making. Hence, they may lack the relevant training and resources to feel fully prepared for this increasingly demanding role.AimThis study aims to provide insight into how prepared commissioners feel in making ethical decisions; what ethics learning needs they might have; and how these might be addressed.Design And SettingThis qualitative interview study explored the experiences of commissioners working for clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England.MethodEighteen participants were interviewed between December 2017 and July 2018 using a purposive sampling approach to participant selection. Transcriptions were coded and analysed using the constant comparative method of thematic analysis.ResultsMost participants had not received ethics training in preparation for, or during, their commissioning role, and reported difficulties identifying and analysing ethical issues. Participants often felt uncomfortable about decisions they were involved in, attributing this to a number of factors: a sense of moral unease; concerns that CCGs' decision-making processes were not sufficiently transparent; and that CCGs were not fully accountable to the population served.ConclusionCommissioners face complex decisions involving ethical issues, and associated moral unease is exacerbated by a lack of ethics training and lack of confidence in identifying and analysing these. This study shows a clear need for additional support and ethics training for commissioners to support them in this area of decision-making.© British Journal of General Practice 2020.

21 keywords...

hide…