• Oliver Poole, Michael Vargo, JinBin Zhang, and Orlando Hung.
• Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Victoria General Hospital, 1276 South Park St. Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada.
• Can J Respir Ther. 2017 Jan 1; 53 (2): 29-32.

BackgroundCricothyrotomy can either be performed by an "open" cricothyrotomy technique, or by a needle (Seldinger) technique. Clinical uncertainty exists regarding which technique is more effective. We compared three different techniques for cricothyrotomy, performed by anesthesiologists on a manikin.MethodsThe techniques studied include an open surgical technique, the Melker Cricothyrotomy kit (Cook), and the Portex Cricothyroidotomy Kit (Smiths Medical). Participants were randomized to the order they performed each technique. Each procedure was videotaped and the time to first ventilation recorded. The participants completed a 10-point scale following the performance of all techniques to assess the subjective level of difficulty of each technique and to indicate which technique they would prefer in a real clinical CICO scenario.ResultsMean time to ventilation was significantly faster with the surgical cricothyrotomy technique, when compared with both the Portex and Melker techniques (Mean difference: Portex-surgical = 18 s, 95% CI (1, 36) and Melker-surgical = 42 s, 95% CI (31, 54)). The Portex technique was significantly faster than the Melker technique (Melker-Portex = 24 s, 95% CI (11, 37)). Six of the 11 (55%) participants preferred the Melker procedure, four (36%) preferred the surgical procedure, and only one anesthesiologist (9%) preferred the Portex procedure.DiscussionThe surgical technique was faster than both the Portex and Melker techniques. The surgical technique was also more successful than the Melker technique. The preferred technique among the participants was the Melker technique, despite being the slowest, least successful, and rated most difficult by participants and observers. This suggests that although the surgical technique may not be preferred by many airway practitioners, it has been shown to be the most likely technique to achieve the primary goal of the procedure: establishing oxygenation and preventing death.Implication StatementThis research examines three techniques for cricothyrotomy in the "Can't Intubate, Can't Oxygenate" scenario. Our data, as well as data from other studies, suggest that a practice shift towards a surgical technique, and away from needle based techniques, may be warranted.

5 keywords...

hide…