• Neuromodulation · Oct 2006

    The use of continuous intrathecal infusion of octreotide in patients with chronic pain of noncancer origin: an evaluation of efficacy in a prospective double-blind fashion.

    • Timothy R Deer, Richard Penn, Christopher K Kim, Richard G Bowman, Matthew Norris, C Douglas Stewart, Tina G Garten, Wilfrido Tolentino, and Yusuf Khan.
    • The Center for Pain Relief, Inc., Charleston, West Virginia 25301, USA.
    • Neuromodulation. 2006 Oct 1;9(4):284-9.

    AbstractObjective.  We evaluated the efficacy of octreotide when administered in a continuous fashion by intrathecal infusion. Materials and Methods.  We used a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded method of analysis to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal octreotide in a population of patients with noncancer pain diagnoses. The patients in this study had an unacceptable response to intrathecal opioids. In the analysis, the patients served as their own controls with a two-armed approach using a phase of treatment with preservative-free saline and a phase of treatment with preservative-free octreotide to assess pain relief. Assessment tools used included visual analog scales and brief pain inventories. Results.  Of the 20 patients randomized in the study, 18 completed all data-collection points. One patient withdrew a week after the first refill because of uncontrollable pain, and the other patient withdrew early due to a lack of transportation. Statistical analysis showed no improvement in efficacy in the octreotide arm at the 6-week end-point when compared to saline. No significant differences were seen in any of the other end-points between the saline and intrathecal drug group. Conclusions.  Intrathecal octreotide did not show significant improvement in pain relief when compared to saline in chronic noncancer pain. It did show significant relief when compared to baseline, suggesting a positive effect of placebo in the control phase. While the overall data showed no clinical efficacy, a small group of patients did well and continued on the therapy in an open label fashion after the study concluded. These patients had pain consistent with a neuropathic pain diagnosis. The patients had noncancer pain, which was not responsive to intrathecal morphine. The lack of side-effects suggests that the dose selected for the study should be increased for future analysis of this agent, and patients with neuropathic pain should be more closely examined.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.