-
Multicenter Study
[Evaluation of a training model for health professionals in the care of critical patients: AIPCAP Study].
- Yoseba Cánovas Zaldúa, Bartomeu Casabella Abril, Carlos Martín Cantera, Fernando González García, Sonia Moreno Escribá, and José Luis Del Val García.
- Centro de Atención Primaria Passeig de Sant Joan, Barcelona, España. Electronic address: ycanovas.bcn.ics@gencat.cat.
- Aten Primaria. 2020 Mar 1; 52 (3): 151-158.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the validity, acceptability, and impact on the level of knowledge and skills of Primary Care health professionals of a training model aimed at improving the care of critical patients.DesignA quasi-experimental interventional, multicentre study.LocationEight health care teams in Barcelona.ParticipantsA total of 272 professionals.InterventionsA training program consisting of 48 simulations of acute myocardial infarction and stroke.Main MeasurementsA checklist was used to evaluate critical patient skills, effect of training on the knowledge of the participants, and a satisfaction survey. The training was carried out after 2 series of simulations (AMI+Stroke). In the second series, 3evaluations were made: in situ, one week after, and at 3weeks. Concordance and reliability were measured. The differences in means were analysed using the Student t test for paired data.ResultsA total of 449 knowledge tests were answered, with a higher score being obtained at the end of each simulation (3.89 -SD 1.01 vs. 3.21 -SD 1.09). Doctors obtained better medical scores than nurses (3.81 - SD 0.87 vs. 3.32 - SD 1.15), and professionals with a specialty completed scored more than those in training (MIR) (3.6 - SD 1.08 vs. 3.4 - SD 1.18). The mean score was 7.7 points (SD 1.56) in the first evaluation, and improved to 9.1 points (SD 0.78). The kappa index was greater than 0.40 in all cases.ConclusionsA training methodology in the management of emergencies in Primary Care based on simulations is valid, reliable and well accepted, achieving an improvement in the level of knowledge and skills of the participating professionals.Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.