• Winthrop F Whitcomb, Joseph E Lucas, Rachel Tornheim, Jennifer L Chiu, and Peter Hayward.
• Remedy Partners, 300 Connecticut Ave, 3rd Floor, Norwalk, CT 06854. Email: wwhitcomb@remedypartners.com.
• Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun 1; 25 (6): 288-294.

ObjectivesTo assess the association of a clinical decision support (CDS) algorithm for hospital discharge disposition with spending, readmissions, and postdischarge emergency department (ED) use.Study DesignA retrospective study in a cohort of fee-for-service Medicare patients 65 years or older linked to a database of patients receiving CDS.MethodsWe evaluated (1) patients whose discharge disposition was concordant with the CDS recommendation versus those whose disposition was not and (2) patients receiving CDS for discharge disposition versus those not receiving CDS, regardless of concordance. Outcomes were spending over a 90-day episode, 90-day readmissions, and postdischarge ED utilization not associated with a readmission.ResultsAnalysis of concordant versus discordant cases showed decreased spending for concordant cases ($860 savings; 95% CI, $162-$1558; P = .016), a decrease in readmissions (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.920; 95% CI, 0.850-0.995; P = .038), and no change in rate of postdischarge ED use (adjusted OR, 0.990; 95% CI, 0.882-1.110; P = .858). Analysis of patients receiving CDS versus not receiving CDS showed no significant difference in spending ($221 savings; 95% CI, -$115 to $557; P = .198), ED use (adjusted OR, 0.959; 95% CI, 0.908-1.012; P = .128), or readmission rate (adjusted OR, 1.004; 95% CI, 0.966-1.043; P = .840).ConclusionsFollowing the recommendation of a CDS algorithm for hospital discharge disposition was associated with lower spending, fewer readmissions, and no change in ED use over a 90-day episode of care.

29 keywords...

hide…