• Martina Džoić Dominković, Gordana Ivanac, and Boris Brkljačić.
• Martina Džoić Dominković, General Hospital Orašje, 3rd Street, 76270 Orašje, Bosnia and Herzegovina, martina.dzoic@gmail.com.
• Croat. Med. J. 2020 Jul 5; 61 (3): 223-229.

AimTo determine the relationship between breast stiffness assessed with sonoelastography (elasticity) and breast tissue density assessed with mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US).MethodsThis cross-sectional study involved 100 women who underwent MG, gray-scale US, and shear-wave sonoelastography during 2013. Mammographic density was categorized into four groups and sonographic density into three groups according to Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System criteria. The stiffness of breast parenchymal and adipose tissue in all breast quadrants was quantified by shear-wave sonoelastography. Mean elastographic estimates were compared with MG- and US-derived density estimates.ResultsParenchymal and adipose tissue elasticity positively correlated with MG- and US-derived breast density (for parenchyma: for MG Kendall's tau b 0.522; Jonckheere-Terpstra test P<0.001 and for US Kendall's tau b 0.533; Jonckheere-Terpstra test P<0.001); the higher was the breast density on MG and US, the higher was the elastographic stiffness.ConclusionSonoelastographic breast stiffness strongly positively correlated with breast density. Thus, sonoelastography may have a potential for estimating the breast cancer risk, which allows a novel application of this technique in routine clinical practice.

23 keywords...

hide…