• Alvin S Das, Robert W Regenhardt, Sarah LaRose, Andrew D Monk, Pedro M Castro, Faheem G Sheriff, Farzaneh A Sorond, and Henrikas Vaitkevicius.
• Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
• J Neuroimaging. 2020 Nov 1; 30 (6): 882-889.

Background And PurposeAlthough transcranial Doppler detects microembolic signals (MES) in numerous settings, the practical significance of such findings remains unclear.MethodsClinical information from ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients (n = 248) who underwent embolic monitoring from January 2015 to December 2018 was obtained.ResultsMES were found in 15% of studies and ischemic recurrence was seen in 11% of patients (over 7 ± 6 days). Patients with MES had more lacunes than those without MES (1 ± 3 vs. 1 ± 2, P = .016), were more likely to have ischemic recurrence (37% vs. 6%, P < .001), undergo a future revascularization procedure (26% vs. 10%, P = .005), have a longer length of stay (9 vs. 4 days, P = .043), and have worse functional disability at discharge (modified Rankin Scale 3-6, 66% vs. 34%, P < .001). After controlling for several relevant cofactors, patients with MES were more likely to have ischemic recurrence (HR 4.90, 95% CI 2.16-11.09, P < .001), worse functional disability (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.22-8.99, P = .019), and longer length of stays (β = .202, P < .001).ConclusionsMES may help to risk stratify patients as their presence is associated with ischemic recurrence and worse outcomes.© 2020 American Society of Neuroimaging.

22 keywords...

hide…