• Sean N Neifert, Michael L Martini, Jonathan S Gal, Samuel Z Maron, Jonathan J Rasouli, Colin D Lamb, Robert J Rothrock, Ian T McNeill, Lauren K Grant, Lisa Genadry, Samuel K Cho, and John M Caridi.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: sean.neifert@icahn.mssm.edu.
• World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec 1; 144: e34-e39.

BackgroundExisting research about surgical start time is equivocal about associations between outcomes and late start times, and there is only one published report investigating start time in spine surgery. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess associations between surgical start time, length of stay (LOS), and cost in lumbar spine surgery.MethodsPatients at a single institution undergoing posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) were grouped based on whether they received their surgery before or after 2 pm, with those receiving their surgery between 12 am and 6 am and receiving surgery for tumors, trauma, or infections being excluded. These 2 groups were then compared on the basis of demographics and outcomes with cost and LOS as the coprimary outcomes.ResultsA total of 2977 patients underwent PLF during the study period. There were minimal differences in preoperative characteristics of the cohorts. The patients who underwent PLF starting after 2 pm had longer LOS (0.45 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.72; P = 0.001) and higher costs ($1343; 95% CI, $339-$2348; P = 0.009) than cases starting before 2 pm The late surgical start cohort also had higher rates of nonhome discharge (29.73% vs. 23.17%, P = 0.0004), and 30-day (4.36% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.01) and 90-day emergency department visits (5.72% vs. 2.94%, P = 0.0005).ConclusionsLate surgical start time is associated with longer LOS and higher cost in patients undergoing PLF.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…