• Lu Che, Xiu H Zhang, Xu Li, Yue L Zhang, Li Xu, and Yu G Huang.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.
• BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul 22; 20 (1): 181.

BackgroundIndividualized fluid management (IFM) has been shown to be useful to improve the postoperative outcome of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. A limited number of clinical studies have been done in orthopaedic patients and have yielded conflicting results. We designed the present study to investigate the clinical impact of IFM in patients undergoing major spine surgery.MethodsThis is a before-after study done in 300 patients undergoing posterior spine arthrodesis. Postoperative outcomes were compared between control group implementing standard fluid management (n = 150) and IFM group (n = 150) guided by fluid protocol based on continuous stroke volume monitoring and optimization. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who developed one or more complications within 30 days following surgery.ResultsDuring surgery, patients received on average the same volume of crystalloids (7.4 vs 7.2 ml/kg/h) and colloids (1.6 vs 1.6 ml/kg/h) before and after the implementation of IFM. During 30 days following surgery, the proportion of patients who developed one or more complications was lower in the IFM group (32 vs 48%, p < 0.01). This difference was mainly explained by a significant decrease in post-operative nausea and vomiting (from 38 to 19%, p < 0.01), urinary tract infections (from 9 to 1%, p < 0.01) and surgical site infections (from 5 to 1%, p < 0.05). Median hospital length of stay was not affected by the implementation of IFM.ConclusionIn patients undergoing major spine surgery, the implementation of IFM was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02470221 . Prospectively registered on June 12, 2015.

33 keywords...

hide…