• Caminos EguillorJuan FranciscoJFDepartment of Applied Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, National University of La Plata, Argentina., Gonzalo Ferrara, Kanoore EdulVanina SihamVS, María Guillermina Buscetti, Héctor Saúl Canales, Bernardo Lattanzio, Luis Gatti, Facundo Javier Gutierrez, and Arnaldo Dubin.
• Department of Applied Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, National University of La Plata, Argentina.
• Shock. 2021 May 1; 55 (5): 686692686-692.

IntroductionAlthough hypothermia is independently associated with an increased mortality in trauma patients, it might be an effective therapeutic approach for otherwise lethal hemorrhage. The effect of hypothermia on microcirculation, however, has been poorly studied in this setting. Our goal was to characterize the effects of hypothermia on microcirculation in normal conditions and in severe hemorrhagic shock.MethodsIn anesthetized and mechanically ventilated sheep, we measured cardiac output (CO), renal blood flow (RBF), and systemic and renal O2 consumption (VO2). Cortical renal, intestinal villi, and sublingual microcirculation was assessed by IDF-videomicroscopy. After basal measurements, sheep were assigned to hypothermia (n = 12) and normothermia (n = 12) groups. Central temperature was reduced to ∼34°C and maintained at baseline in each group, respectively. Measurements were repeated after 1 h of hemodynamic stable conditions and 1 h of severe hemorrhagic shock.ResultsIn conditions of hemodynamic stability, the hypothermia group showed lower CO, RBF, and systemic and renal VO2 than the normothermia group. Red blood cell velocity was also lower in renal, villi, and sublingual microvascular beds (836 ± 195 vs. 1,066 ± 162, 916 ± 105 vs. 1051 ± 41, and 970 ± 182 vs. 1,102 ± 49 μm/s, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all). In hemorrhagic shock, most of the microvascular variables were similarly compromised in both the groups. In hypo- and normothermia groups, the percentage of reduction in perfused vascular density was higher in renal than in intestinal and sublingual microcirculation (66 ± 31 vs. 31 ± 23 and 15 ± 15%, and 78 ± 26 vs. 32 ± 37 and 18 ± 21%, P < 0.01 for both).ConclusionsThis is the first experimental study assessing the effect of systemic hypothermia on microcirculation in severe hemorrhagic shock. The main finding was that hypothermia did not hamper additionally the microcirculatory derangements induced by hemorrhagic shock. In addition, renal microcirculation was more susceptible to hemorrhagic shock than villi and sublingual microcirculation.Copyright © 2020 by the Shock Society.

12 keywords...

hide…