• Circ Cardiovasc Interv · Nov 2017

    Review Meta Analysis

    Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.

    • Dhaval Kolte, Partha Sardar, Sahil Khera, Uwe Zeymer, Holger Thiele, Matthias Hochadel, Dragana Radovanovic, Paul Erne, Kristina Hambraeus, Stefan James, Bimmer E Claessen, Henriques Jose P S JPS From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Brown University, Providence, RI (D.K., H.D.A., J.D.A.); Department of Medicine, Division , Darren Mylotte, Philippe Garot, Wilbert S Aronow, Theophilus Owan, Diwakar Jain, Julio A Panza, William H Frishman, Gregg C Fonarow, Deepak L Bhatt, Herbert D Aronow, and J Dawn Abbott.
    • From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Brown University, Providence, RI (D.K., H.D.A., J.D.A.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (P.S., T.O.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (S.K., W.S.A., D.J., J.A.P., W.H.F.); Department of Cardiology, Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z., M.H.); Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Germany (H.T.); German Cardiovascular Research Center (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany (H.T.); AMIS Plus Data Center, University of Zurich, Switzerland (D.R., P.E.); Department of Cardiology, Falun Hospital, Sweden (K.H.); Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden (K.H., S.J.); Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.E.C., J.P.S.H.); Department of Cardiology, Galway University Hospital, SAOLTA Healthcare Group, National University of Ireland (D.M.); Department of Cardiology, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Hopital Privé Jacques Cartier, Massy, France (P.G.); Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David-Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles (G.C.F.); and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.L.B.).
    • Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1; 10 (11).

    BackgroundThe optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction remains unknown.Methods And ResultsDatabases were searched from 1999 to October 2016. Studies comparing immediate/single-stage multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) versus culprit vessel-only PCI (CO-PCI) in patients with multivessel disease, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock were included. Primary end point was short-term (in-hospital or 30 days) mortality. Secondary end points included long-term mortality, cardiovascular death, reinfarction, and repeat revascularization. Safety end points were in-hospital stroke, renal failure, and major bleeding. The meta-analysis included 11 nonrandomized studies and 5850 patients (1157 MV-PCI and 4693 CO-PCI). There was no significant difference in short-term mortality with MV-PCI versus CO-PCI (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.43; P=0.61). Similarly, there were no significant differences in long-term mortality (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.54-1.30; P=0.43), cardiovascular death (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.42-1.23; P=0.23), reinfarction (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.84-3.26; P=0.15), or repeat revascularization (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.76-1.69; P=0.54) between the 2 groups. There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher in-hospital stroke (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98-2.72; P=0.06) and renal failure (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.98-1.72; P=0.06), with no difference in major bleeding (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.39-5.63; P=0.57) with MV-PCI when compared with CO-PCI.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies suggests that in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, there may be no significant benefit with single-stage MV-PCI compared with CO-PCI. Given the limitations of observational data, randomized trials are needed to determine the role of MV-PCI in this setting.© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.