• Andrew D Schreiner, John Bian, Jingwen Zhang, Elizabeth B Kirkland, Marc E Heincelman, Samuel O Schumann, Patrick D Mauldin, William P Moran, and Don C Rockey.
• Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. Electronic address: schrein@musc.edu.
• Am. J. Med. Sci. 2019 Aug 1; 358 (2): 127-133.

BackgroundMany guidelines addressing the approach to abnormal liver chemistries, including bilirubin, transaminases and alkaline phosphatase, recommend repeating the tests. However, when clinicians repeat testing is unknown.Material And MethodsThis retrospective study followed adult patients with abnormal liver chemistries in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) from 2007 to 2016. All PCMH patients possessing at least 1 abnormal liver test (total bilirubin, aminotransferases and alkaline phosphatase) were included. Patients were followed from the index abnormal liver chemistry until the next liver test result, or the end of the study period. The primary predictor variable of interest was the number of abnormal chemistries (out of 4) on index testing. Demographic and clinical variables served as other potential predictors of outcome. A Cox proportional hazards model was applied to investigate associations between the predictor variables and the time to repeat liver chemistry testing.ResultsOf 9,545 patients with at least 2 PCMH visits and 1 liver test abnormality, 6,489 (68%) obtained repeat testing within 1 year, and 80% of patients had follow-up tests within 2 years. Patients with multiple abnormal liver tests and those with higher degrees of abnormality were associated with shorter time to repeat testing.ConclusionsA large proportion of patients with abnormal liver tests still lack repeat testing at 1 year. The number of liver abnormal liver tests and degree of elevation were inversely associated with the time to repeat testing.Copyright © 2019 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

28 keywords...

hide…