• Kelsey L Komyathy, William R Judd, Patrick D Ratliff, and Robert E Hughes.
• Department of Pharmacy - Clinical and Patient Care Services, Duke University Hospital, 2301 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710, United States of America. Electronic address: kelsey.komyathy@duke.edu.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 1; 38 (9): 1816-1819.

ObjectiveTo determine the impact of reported beta-lactam allergies on in-hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes in patients who presented with severe sepsis or septic shock.MethodsThis single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed at a 35-bed emergency department in central Kentucky. Patients presenting with sepsis, aged 18years or older, were identified between October 2016 and June 2017.Results438 patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock were identified. Rates of the combined endpoint of in-hospital mortality or transfer to hospice were similar in patients with a beta-lactam allergy (7.2%) versus those with no reported beta-lactam allergy (10.4%) (p=0.41). Time to initiation of antibiotic therapy was slightly longer in the beta-lactam allergic group (2.2h) versus those with no reported beta-lactam allergy (2.15h), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.993). Patients were 20.9% more likely to receive an appropriate empiric antibiotic, based off of retrospective culture review, if they did not report a beta-lactam allergy (p=0.009). This led to a delay in effective therapy of 1.59h in the reported beta-lactam allergy arm (p=0.037).ConclusionsAdequate documentation of beta-lactam allergies is vital to ensure timely and appropriate treatment in patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock. Choosing alternative treatment options results in increased time to effective antibiotics, reduced likelihood of covering cultures with first antibiotic, and increased total hospital and variable direct cost.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

20 keywords...

hide…