• Youssef Rahou-El-Bachiri, Marcos J Navarro-Santana, Guido F Gómez-Chiguano, Joshua A Cleland, Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago, and Gustavo Plaza-Manzano.
• Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
• J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 29; 9 (7).

BackgroundTo evaluate the effect of trigger point dry needling alone or as an adjunct with other interventions on pain and related disability in people with knee pain.MethodsSeveral electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials where at least one group received dry needling for knee pain. Studies had to include human subjects and collect outcomes on pain and pain-related disability in musculoskeletal knee pain. Data were extracted by two reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane Guidelines, methodological quality was assessed with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) score, and the quality of evidence by using the GRADE approach. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated.ResultsTen studies (six patellofemoral pain, two knee osteoarthritis, two post-surgery knee pain) were included. The meta-analysis found moderate effect sizes of dry needling for reducing pain (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.19) and improving related disability (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.09) as compared to a comparison group at short-term. The main effect was observed for patellofemoral pain (SMD -0.64, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.11). No significant effects were observed at mid- or long-term follow-ups. The risk of bias was generally low, but the heterogenicity and the imprecision of the results downgraded the level of evidence.ConclusionLow to moderate evidence suggests a positive effect of trigger point dry needling on pain and related disability in patellofemoral pain, but not knee osteoarthritis or post-surgery knee pain, at short-term. More high-quality trials investigating long-term effects are clearly needed.

4 keywords...

hide…