• Sakae Konishi, Shingo Hatakeyama, Toshiaki Tanaka, Yoshinori Ikehata, Toshikazu Tanaka, Naoki Fujita, Yusuke Ishibashi, Hayato Yamamoto, Takahiro Yoneyama, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Kazuaki Yoshikawa, Toshiaki Kawaguchi, Naoya Masumori, Hiroshi Kitamura, and Chikara Ohyama.
• Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-chou, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
• Med. Oncol. 2018 Nov 24; 36 (1): 6.

AbstractWe aimed to compare oncological outcomes and safety of axitinib and sunitinib in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We retrospectively evaluated 169 patients with mRCC who were treated with axitinib or sunitinib as the first-line therapy in five hospitals between October 2008 and August 2018. Oncological outcomes and safety were compared between axitinib (n = 68) and sunitinib (n = 101) groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate effects of first-line therapies on progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Patients in the axitinib group were significantly older (66 vs. 72 years) than those in the sunitinib group. Median relative dose intensity was significantly higher in the axitinib group (94 ± 62%) than in the sunitinib group (65 ± 20%; P = 0.001). Objective response rate was significantly higher in the axitinib group (21%) than in the sunitinib group (10%; P = 0.042). IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed significant differences in CSS and OS but not in PFS between the two groups. Safety in terms of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly different between the axitinib (34%) and sunitinib (55%) groups (P = 0.006). Compared with sunitinib, axitinib significantly prolonged CSS and OS and showed a safer profile as the first-line therapy for treatment-naïve mRCC.

27 keywords...

hide…