• Benjamin Mayer, Simone Tadler, Dietrich Rothenbacher, Julia Seeger, and Jochen Wöhrle.
• Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
• Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Nov 1; 36 (11): 1889-1896.

ObjectiveLack of structural equality is a major issue to be addressed in observational studies. Their major disadvantage of these studies compared to randomized controlled trials is the vulnerability towards confounding, but they often better mirror real world patients and, therefore, entail an increased external validity. Numerous approaches have been developed to account for confounding in observational research, including multiple regression, subgroup analysis and matched cohort designs. The latter has been often described as a useful tool if large control data sets are available.MethodsIn this paper we present a hierarchical matching algorithm entailing two stages which enables a multicentric matched cohort study to be conducted. In particular, the algorithm defines the matching strategy as a combination of exact matching and a subsequent consideration of further matching variables to be controlled using a distance measure (e.g. the propensity score).ResultsThe algorithm is applied to a study in interventional cardiology and demonstrates high flexibility and usefulness with regard to the aim of finding comparable cases of exposed and non-exposed patients from observational data. The algorithm increased structural equality by balancing the most important covariates which might be of different importance for the matching process.ConclusionThe implementation of the algorithm in the statistical software SAS offers high flexibility regarding an application to various data analysis projects. Specifically, it provides a broader range of features (e.g. diverse distance measures) when compared to other existing solutions for conducting matched cohort analyses.

12 keywords...

hide…