• Deborah J Cook, Michelle E Kho, Eric H Duan, Waleed Alhazzani, Alyson Takaoka, France J Clarke, Nicole Zytaruk, and Meredith Vanstone.
• Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University; and Department of Critical Care, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
• Crit. Care Med. 2020 Oct 1; 48 (10): 1403-1410.

ObjectivesTo describe the importance of critical care clinical research that is not pandemic-focused during pandemic times; outline principles to assist in the prioritization of nonpandemic research during pandemic times; and propose a guiding framework for decisions about whether, when and how to continue nonpandemic research while still honoring the moral and scientific imperative to launch research that is pandemic-focused.Design/Data SourcesUsing in-person, email, and videoconference exchanges, we convened an interprofessional clinical research group, conducted a literature review of empirical studies, ethics documents and expert commentaries (2010 to present), and viewed traditional and social media posts (March 2020 to May 2020). Stakeholder consultation involved scientific, ethics, clinical, and administrative leaders.SettingClinical research in the ICU.PatientsPatients with and without coronavirus disease 2019.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsWhile clinical research should be prioritized to advantage patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in order to care for affected patients, it ideally would not unduly disadvantage patients without coronavirus disease 2019. Thus, timely, rigorous, relevant, and ethical clinical research is needed to improve the care and optimize outcomes for both patients with and without coronavirus disease 2019, acknowledging how many studies that are not exclusively focused on coronavirus disease 2019 remain relevant to patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Considerations to continue nonpandemic-focused research include the status of the pandemic, local jurisdictional guidance, capacity and safety of bedside and research personnel, disposition of patients already enrolled in nonpandemic studies, analyzing characteristics of each nonpandemic-focused study, research oversight, and final reporting requirements.ConclusionsDeliberation about continuing nonpandemic research should use objective, transparent criteria considering several aspects of the research process such as bedside and research staff safety, infection control, the informed consent model, protocol complexity, data collection, and implementation integrity. Decisions to pause or pursue nonpandemic research should be proportionate, transparent, and revisited as the pandemic abates.

27 keywords...

hide…