• Bo Hu, Hui Xiang, Yue Dong, Erica Portner, Zhiyong Peng, and Kianoush Kashani.
• Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
• J Crit Care. 2020 Dec 1; 60: 143-151.

PurposeTo assess the impact of the timeline of sepsis bundle completion with clinical outcomes in septic shock.Materials And MethodsWe retrospectively studied adult (≥18 years) patients with septic shock from January 1, 2006, through May 31, 2018, who were admitted to the intensive care unit in Mayo Clinic, Rochester. We divided patients into three groups based on the SSC compliant 1) <1h, 2) 1.1 to 3 h, 3) >3 h after the time of septic shock diagnosis.ResultsWe enrolled 1052 septic shock patients, among 8% were in group 1, 26% in group 2, and the remaining in group 3. Those who completed all bundle components within 3 h had the lowest 28-day mortality (17.5% vs. 31.4%, p < .001) and higher survival at 90 days (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.80; p < .001). Sepsis bundle completion in <1 h had no significant advantage in 28-day mortality (21.5% vs.15.9%, p = .4) or 90-day survival compared with group 2 (HR = 1.08; 95% CI 0.77-1.53; p = .6).ConclusionsWe showed an association between the completion of SSC bundle components within three hours with lower mortality or earlier shock reversal. This relationship was not evident when compared to bundle completion in 1 h vs. within 3 h.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…