• World Neurosurg · Dec 2020

    Review Meta Analysis

    Comparison of bypass and non-bypass surgical treatments for internal carotid artery blood blister-like aneurysms: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and outcomes.

    • Vladimir Balik, Pavla Kourilova, Igor J Sulla, Jana Vrbkova, Josef Srovnal, Igor Sulla, and Sandeep Talari.
    • Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Neurosurgery, Svet Zdravia Hospital Michalovce, Michalovce, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: balik.vladimir@gmail.com.
    • World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec 1; 144: 283-292.e12.

    BackgroundThe optimal surgical strategy for treating internal carotid artery (ICA) blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) has remained unclear. Although some have preferred bypass surgery, others have favored less-demanding surgical methods. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of bypass and non-bypass surgical methods when intended as primary treatment of ICA BBAs.MethodsStudies reporting data on the outcomes of interest for surgically treated patients with ICA BBAs were searched for in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The data were analyzed using random effects modeling.ResultsSeven observational studies involving 140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients treated with bypass surgery, compared with those treated with non-bypass techniques, had lower odds of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.02; P = 0.57; I2 = 0%), postoperative vasospasm (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.38-7.92; P = 0.48; I2 = 19%), intraoperative bleeding (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 0.82-13.90; P = 0.09; I2 = 0%), postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.47-7.76; P = 0.36; I2 = 0%), and postoperative recurrence of BBAs (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.54-8.66; P < 0.28; I2 = 0%). No comparison, however, achieved statistical significance.ConclusionsFor surgeons who use both bypass and non-bypass surgical strategies, the 2 methods seemed comparable in terms of the outcomes of interest, although the bypass technique appeared superior. However, comparisons with studies reporting bypass as the uniquely preferred technique have indicated that specialization in, and preference for, the bypass procedure has been associated with more favorable outcomes.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…