• G Stein, C Meyer, L Marlow, H Christ, L P Müller, J Isenberg, P Eysel, G Schiffer, and C Faymonville.
• Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. gregor.stein@uk-koeln.de.
• Unfallchirurg. 2017 Feb 1; 120 (2): 122-128.

BackgroundType II fractures of the odontoid process of the axis are the most common injury of the cervical spine in elderly patients. Only little evidence exists on whether elderly patients should be treated conservatively or surgically.Material And MethodsThe mortality and survival probability of 51 patients were determined in a retrospective study. The range of motion, pain and the neck disability index were clinically investigated.ResultsOf the 51 patients 37 were treated surgically and 14 conservatively. The conservatively treated group showed a higher mortality (64 % vs. 32 %). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median survival of the conservatively treated group of 29 months, whereby during the first 3 months of treatment this group showed a higher survival probability and afterwards the surgically treated group showed a higher survival probability. The clinical examination of 20 patients revealed limited range of motion of the cervical spine. Additionally, moderate levels of pain and complaints were recorded using the neck disability index.ConclusionFractures of the odontoid process pose a far-reaching danger for elderly patients. A balanced assessment of the general condition should be carried out at the beginning of treatment of these patients. In the early phase following trauma no differences were found with respect to survival rates but for long-term survival the operatively treated group showed advantages; however, these advantages cannot be causally attributed to the choice of therapy.

33 keywords...

hide…