• Pain Med · Mar 2016

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.

    • Yelena Granovsky, Adi Miller-Barmak, Oren Goldstein, Elliot Sprecher, and David Yarnitsky.
    • *Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus y_granovsky@rambam.health.gov.il.
    • Pain Med. 2016 Mar 1; 17 (3): 521-529.

    ObjectivesAssessment of pain inhibitory mechanisms using conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is relevant clinically in prediction of pain and analgesic efficacy. Our objective is to provide necessary estimates of intersession CPM reliability, to enable transformation of the CPM paradigm into a clinical tool.DesignTwo cohorts of young healthy subjects (N = 65) participated in two dual-session studies. In Study I, a Bath-Thermode CPM protocol was used, with hot water immersion and contact heat as conditioning- and test-stimuli, respectively, in a classical parallel CPM design introducing test-stimulus first, and then the conditioning- and repeated test-stimuli in parallel. Study II consisted of two CPM protocols: 1) Two-Thermodes, one for each of the stimuli, in the same parallel design as above, and 2) single test-stimulus (STS) protocol with a single administration of a contact heat test-stimulus, partially overlapped in time by a remote shorter contact heat as conditioning stimulus. Test-retest reliability was assessed within 3-7 days.ResultsThe STS-CPM had superior reliability intraclass correlation (ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.59) over Bath-Thermode (ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.34) or Two-Thermodes (ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.21) protocols. The hand immersion conditioning pain had higher reliability than thermode pain (ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.76 vs ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.16). Conditioned test-stimulus pain scores were of good (ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.62) or fair (ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.43) reliability for the Bath-Thermode and the STS, respectively, but not for the Two-Thermodes protocol (ICC2 ,: 1 = 0.20).ConclusionsThe newly developed STS-CPM paradigm was more reliable than other CPM protocols tested here, and should be further investigated for its clinical relevance. It appears that large contact size of the conditioning-stimulus and use of single rather than dual test-stimulus pain contribute to augmentation of CPM reliability.© 2015 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…