• Seth A Berkowitz, Jessica O'Neill, Edward Sayer, Naysha N Shahid, Maegan Petrie, Sophie Schouboe, Megan Saraceno, and Rochelle Bellin.
• Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: seth_berkowitz@med.unc.edu.
• Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec 1; 57 (6 Suppl 1): S55-S64.

IntroductionSocioeconomically vulnerable individuals often face poor access to nutritious food and bear a disproportionate burden of diet-related chronic illness. This study tested whether a subsidized community-supported agriculture intervention could improve diet quality.Study DesignAn RCT was conducted from May 2017 to December 2018 (data analyzed in 2019).Setting/ParticipantsAdults with a BMI >25 kg/m2 seen at a community health center in central Massachusetts, or who lived in the surrounding county, were eligible.InterventionIndividuals were randomized to receive either subsidized community-supported agriculture membership (which provided a weekly farm produce pickup from June to November) or healthy eating information (control group). For equity, the control group received financial incentives similar to the intervention group.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was the Healthy Eating Index 2010 total score (range, 0-100; higher indicates better diet quality; minimum clinically meaningful difference, 3). Healthy Eating Index was assessed using 3 24-hour recalls per participant collected each growing season. Intention-to-treat analyses compared Healthy Eating Index scores between the intervention and control group, accounting for repeated measures with generalized estimating equations.ResultsThere were 128 participants enrolled and 122 participants for analysis. The participants' mean age was 50.3 (SD=13.6) years; 82% were women; and 88% were white, non-Hispanic, with a similar distribution of baseline characteristics comparing the intervention and control groups. Baseline Healthy Eating Index total score was 53.9 (SD=15.3) in the control group and 55.1 (SD=15.2) in the intervention group (p=0.68). The intervention increased the mean Healthy Eating Index total score relative to the control group (4.3 points higher, 95% CI=0.5, 8.1, p=0.03). Food insecurity was lower in the intervention group (RR=0.68, 95% CI=0.48, 0.96).ConclusionsA community-supported agriculture intervention resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in diet quality. Subsidized community-supported agriculture may be an important intervention for vulnerable individuals.Trial RegistrationThis study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03231592.Supplement InformationThis article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.Copyright © 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

11 keywords...

hide…