• Journal of cardiology · Mar 2007

    Comparative Study

    [Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by the axius auto ejection fraction method: comparison with manual trace method and visual assessment of ejection fraction].

    • Junichi Kawai, Kazuaki Tanabe, Kazuto Yamaguchi, Yusaku Hosoi, Masayuki Watanabe, Tomoko Tani, Toshikazu Yagi, Yoko Fujii, Toshiko Konda, Toshiaki Sumida, Hitomi Nakamura, Kazuyo Ui, Ayako Yoneyama, Shigefumi Morioka, and Yasuki Kihara.
    • Division of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe General Hospital, Minatojima Naka-machi 4-6, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0046. jkawai@kcgh.gr.jp
    • J Cardiol. 2007 Mar 1; 49 (3): 125-34.

    ObjectivesVisual assessment of the ejection fraction (EF) is often used in clinical practice, but is subjective and requires training and experience. The auto EF method has been newly developed for automated detection of the left ventricular (LV) endocardial border throughout the cardiac cycle. The clinical feasibility was assessed of the auto EF method for measuring LV volumes and EF in patients. Manually traced EF measured by the biplane modified Simpson's rule was used as the reference standard.MethodsThe study population consisted of 30 consecutive patients with normal sinus rhythm. All patients underwent two-dimensional echocardiography. The auto EF method incorporated pattern and shape recognition to automatically locate the LV, track the endocardium, and calculate EF from routine digital images. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and EF measured by the auto EF method were compared those by the manually traced method. LVEF by the Auto EF method was also compared with visual EF determined by nonattending physicians.ResultsAuto EF was more reproducible than visual EF by the expert reader. LVEF by the auto EF method had excellent correlation and close limits of agreement with manually traced EF compared with visual EF(4-chamber view: y = 1.10 x - 4.28, r = 0.94, bias = 1.6%, 2-chamber view: y = 0.88 x + 7.25, r = 0.90, bias = 0.4%). LV volumes by the auto EF method underestimated those by manually traced EF (end-diastolic volume by 4-chamber view: y = 0.72 x + 8.92, r = 0.93, bias = - 16.7 ml, end-systolic volume by 4-chamber view: y = 0.82 x - 0.97, r = 0.98, bias = - 8.5 ml, end-diastolic volume by 2-chamber view: y = 0.73 x + 12.4, r = 0.82, bias = - 12.3 ml, end-systolic volume by 2-chamber view: y = 0.65 x + 6.94, r = 0.90, bias = - 6.8 ml).ConclusionsThe auto EF method is a clinically useful tool for the measurement of LV volumes and EF.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.