• Nigel L Rozario, Alica Sparling, Ryan Burns, Andrew McWilliams, Jennifer H Brady, Marc Kowalkowski, and Jason Roberge.
• From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB). nrozario@alumni.uncc.edu.
• J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Mar 1; 33 (2): 252-261.

PurposeClinical evidence shows minimal benefit to vitamin D screening and subsequent treatment in the general population. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of 2 light-touch interventions on reducing vitamin D test orders.MethodsThe outcomes were weekly average vitamin D rates, computed from adult primary care encounters (preventive or nonpreventive) with a family medicine (FM) or internal medicine (IM) provider from June 14, 2018 through December 12, 2018. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis and estimated the cost impact of the interventions. The interventions consisted of an educational memo (August 9, 2018) distributed to providers and removal of the vitamin D test (FM: August 15, 2018; IM: October 17, 2018) from the providers' quick order screen in the electronic health record. Change in order rates were analyzed among physicians (MDs and DOs), physician assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs).ResultsThere were 587,506 primary care encounters (FM = 367,947; IM = 219,559). Vitamin D order rates decreased from 6.9% (FM = 5.1%; IM = 9.9%) to 5.2% (FM = 4% [P < .01], IM = 7.9% [P < .01]). For FM, the vitamin D test order rate continued to fall at a 0.08% per week rate after the interventions (end of study: 2.73%). The education intervention showed a relative decrease in each provider type (FM-physician = 16% [P < .01], FM-PA = 47% [P < .01], FM-NP = 20% [P = .01], IM-physician = 14% [P = .02], IM-PA = 52% [P < .01], IM-NP = 34% [P = .04]). Annualized savings was approximately 1 million dollars.ConclusionsEmailed evidence-based provider education may be an effective tool for modifying providers' vitamin D test ordering behavior. The lack of the effectiveness of the vitamin D test removal from the quick order screen found for IM highlights the challenges facing simple electronic health record interventions when multiple alternate ordering pathways exist.© Copyright 2020 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

13 keywords...

hide…