• Eur J Pain · Jan 2021

    Perceived validation and criticism in pain: development of a new measure in chronic pain.

    • Sérgio Andrade Carvalho, José Pinto-Gouveia, David Gillanders, and Paula Castilho.
    • Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
    • Eur J Pain. 2021 Jan 1; 25 (1): 136-148.

    BackgroundResearch suggests that the way others react to a pain flare-up impacts on psychological and pain-related symptoms in chronic pain (CP). Experiencing validation from others is associated with less negative emotions and better functioning. Contrarily, experiencing criticism is linked to greater pain intensity and worse functioning. Nonetheless, studies are limited by an exclusive focus on spouses rather than significant other relationships, the use of proxy constructs (e.g. social support, responsiveness, solicitousness) rather than specific measures of validation and criticism and a focus on significant others' behaviour rather than patients' subjective experience. This study examines the psychometric properties of a new measure - Perceived Validation and Criticism in Pain Questionnaire (PVCPQ), and tests its contribution to functional impairment beyond pain intensity, sociodemographic and medical-related variables, positive and negative affect, safeness and compassion from others.MethodsWomen with CP (N = 172), 130 (75.6%) of whom had fibromyalgia, completed an online battery of questionnaires (PVCPQ; numeric pain rating scale; work and social adjustment scale; positive and negative affect schedule; social and pleasure scale; compassionate engagement and action scale). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), reliability analysis, correlational analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were performed.ResultsEFA showed a 23-item two-factor solution with good psychometric properties. Criticism in pain (but not validation in pain) contributed to functional impairment above and beyond the variance explained by pain intensity, sociodemographic and medical variables, positive and negative affect, safeness and compassion from others.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that the PVCPQ is a psychometrically valid new measure of perceived validation and criticism in pain that contributes to explaining pain-related functional impairment.SignificanceThe current study provides a new 23-item measure of perceived validation and criticism by others in chronic pain that overcomes the limitations of existing measures. It adds to the literature by suggesting that perceived criticism (but not validation) contributes to functional impairment beyond sociodemographic variables, pain intensity, affect and related constructs such as social safeness and compassion from others. These results suggest that psychosocial interventions that aim to promote functioning in chronic pain should focus on the subjective experience of being criticized and validated by significant others.© 2020 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…