• Masahiro Morita, Chikara Ogawa, Akina Omura, Teruyo Noda, Atsushi Kubo, Toshihiro Matsunaka, Hiroyuki Tamaki, Mitsushige Shibatoge, Hiroshi Seno, Yasunori Minami, Kazuomi Ueshima, Toshiharu Sakurai, Naoshi Nishida, and Masatoshi Kudo.
• Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital, Japan.
• Intern. Med. 2020 Jan 1; 59 (4): 471477471-477.

AbstractObjective The usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for making decisions in the treatment of liver abscess is unknown. Methods We evaluated the internal blood flow in the arterial-predominant phase by CEUS using Sonazoid® in 21 patients. The stain area rate was evaluated in maximum parting plane of abscess in CEUS. Patients were divided into two groups: the vascular phase enhancement (VE) group, in which ≥50% of the abscess cavity was enhanced (12 patients), and the vascular phase non-enhancement (VNE) group, in which <50% of the abscess cavity was enhanced (9 patients). The rate of patients who were cured by conservative treatment alone was examined in both groups. The defect rate of all liver abscesses in the post-vascular phase was also evaluated. Results In the VE group, improvement by conservative treatment alone was obtained in 11 out of 12 patients (91.7%), while in the VNE group, improvement by conservative treatment alone was obtained in only 1 out of 9 patients (11.1%), a significant difference (p<0.001). In the VE group, one patient did not improve with conservative treatment alone because the abscess ruptured near the liver surface. In the VE group, the abscess size was smaller than in the VNE group. By examining the defect rate in the post-vascular phase, it was found that 16 out of 21 patients (76.2%) showed 71% or more defects. Conclusion The enhancement rate in the arterial-predominant phase of CEUS was considered useful for determining the treatment approach for liver abscess.

25 keywords...

hide…