• Olga Theou, Edwin C K Tan, J Simon Bell, Tina Emery, Leonie Robson, John E Morley, Kenneth Rockwood, and Renuka Visvanathan.
• National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, Trans-disciplinary Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Aging, South Australia, Australia.
• J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov 1; 64 (11): e207-e212.

ObjectivesTo compare the FRAIL-NH scale with the Frailty Index in assessing frailty in residential aged care facilities.DesignCross-sectional.SettingSix Australian residential aged care facilities.ParticipantsIndividuals aged 65 and older (N = 383, mean aged 87.5 ± 6.2, 77.5% female).MeasurementsFrailty was assessed using the 66-item Frailty Index and the FRAIL-NH scale. Other measures examined were dementia diagnosis, level of care, resident satisfaction with care, nurse-reported resident quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and professional caregiver burden.ResultsThe FRAIL-NH scale was significantly associated with the Frailty Index (correlation coefficient = 0.81, P < .001). Based on the Frailty Index, 60.8% of participants were categorized as frail and 24.4% as most frail. Based on the FRAIL-NH, 37.5% of participants were classified as frail and 35.9% as most frail. Women were assessed as being frailer than men using both tools (P = .006 for FI; P = .03 for FRAIL-NH). Frailty Index levels were higher in participants aged 95 and older (0.39 ± 0.13) than in those aged younger than 85 (0.33 ± 0.13; P = .008) and in participants born outside Australia (0.38 ± 0.13) than in those born in Australia (0.34 ± 0.13; P = .01). Both frailty tools were associated with most characteristics that would indicate higher care needs, with the Frailty Index having stronger associations with all of these measures.ConclusionThe FRAIL-NH scale is a simple and practical method to screen for frailty in residential aged care facilities.© 2016, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2016, The American Geriatrics Society.

28 keywords...

hide…