-
Multicenter Study
Diagnostic and prognostic implications using age- and gender-specific cut-offs for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T - Sub-analysis from the TRAPID-AMI study.
- Matthias Mueller-Hennessen, Bertil Lindahl, Evangelos Giannitsis, Moritz Biener, Mehrshad Vafaie, Christopher R deFilippi, Michael Christ, Miguel Santalo-Bel, Mauro Panteghini, Mario Plebani, Franck Verschuren, Tomas Jernberg, John K French, Robert H Christenson, Richard Body, James McCord, Peter Dilba, Hugo A Katus, Christian Mueller, and TRAPID-AMI Investigators.
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology & Pulmonology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Int. J. Cardiol. 2016 Apr 15; 209: 26-33.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of age- and gender-specific cut-offs for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) compared to the general 99th percentile hs-cTnT cut-off on diagnosis and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods1282 unselected patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected AMI were enrolled as part of the TRAPID-AMI study. In the present sub-analysis, reclassification of AMI diagnosis was performed by comparing the general hs-cTnT cut-off of 14ng/L to previously proposed age- and gender-dependent hs-cTnT 99th percentile cut-offs (28ng/L for ≥65years, 9ng/L for female and 15.5ng/L for male patients). Patients were further clinically adjudicated into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and non-ACS.ResultsFor patients ≥65years, application of age-specified cut-offs resulted in a decrease of AMI from 29.8% to 18.3% in the entire cohort (n=557) and 54.7% to 40.9% in the ACS subcohort (n=225). Using gender-specific cut-offs, AMI-rate increased from 16.6% to 22.6% (entire cohort, n=477) and 62.6% to 71.7% (ACS subcohort, n=99) in women, whereas in men, rates decreased from 23.1% to 21.1% (entire cohort, n=805) and 48.8% to 45.9% (ACS, n=281), respectively. Age-specified cut-offs significantly reclassified patients for outcomes of 1-month and 3-month mortality in the entire and ACS cohort (14.2% net reclassification improvement, p<0.001, respectively). Contrary, no significant differences in outcomes could be found using gender-specific cut-offs.ConclusionsWhile influence of gender-specific hs-cTnT cut-offs on diagnostic and prognostic reclassification was only modest in patients with suspected AMI, age-specific cut-offs showed a significant impact and may be considered for further validation.Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.