-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Elective versus Therapeutic Neck Dissection in Node-Negative Oral Cancer.
- Anil K D'Cruz, Richa Vaish, Neeti Kapre, Mitali Dandekar, Sudeep Gupta, Rohini Hawaldar, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Gouri Pantvaidya, Devendra Chaukar, Anuja Deshmukh, Shubhada Kane, Supreeta Arya, Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Prathamesh Pai, Sudhir Nair, Deepa Nair, Rajendra Badwe, and Head and Neck Disease Management Group.
- From Head Neck Services (A.K.D., R.V., N.K., M.D., G.P., D.C., A.D., P.C., P.P., S.N., D.N.), Department of Medical Oncology, Advanced Center for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (S.G.), Clinical Research Secretariat (R.H.), and the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.P.A., S.G.-L.), Head Cytology (S.K.), Radio-diagnosis (S.A.), and Surgical Oncology (R.B.) - all at the Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
- N. Engl. J. Med.. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):521-9.
BackgroundWhether patients with early-stage oral cancers should be treated with elective neck dissection at the time of the primary surgery or with therapeutic neck dissection after nodal relapse has been a matter of debate.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we evaluated the effect on survival of elective node dissection (ipsilateral neck dissection at the time of the primary surgery) versus therapeutic node dissection (watchful waiting followed by neck dissection for nodal relapse) in patients with lateralized stage T1 or T2 oral squamous-cell carcinomas. Primary and secondary end points were overall survival and disease-free survival, respectively.ResultsBetween 2004 and 2014, a total of 596 patients were enrolled. As prespecified by the data and safety monitoring committee, this report summarizes results for the first 500 patients (245 in the elective-surgery group and 255 in the therapeutic-surgery group), with a median follow-up of 39 months. There were 81 recurrences and 50 deaths in the elective-surgery group and 146 recurrences and 79 deaths in the therapeutic-surgery group. At 3 years, elective node dissection resulted in an improved rate of overall survival (80.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74.1 to 85.8), as compared with therapeutic dissection (67.5%; 95% CI, 61.0 to 73.9), for a hazard ratio for death of 0.64 in the elective-surgery group (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.92; P=0.01 by the log-rank test). At that time, patients in the elective-surgery group also had a higher rate of disease-free survival than those in the therapeutic-surgery group (69.5% vs. 45.9%, P<0.001). Elective node dissection was superior in most subgroups without significant interactions. Rates of adverse events were 6.6% and 3.6% in the elective-surgery group and the therapeutic-surgery group, respectively.ConclusionsAmong patients with early-stage oral squamous-cell cancer, elective neck dissection resulted in higher rates of overall and disease-free survival than did therapeutic neck dissection. (Funded by the Tata Memorial Centre; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00193765.).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.