• Int J Epidemiol · Apr 2015

    Incremental predictive value of 152 single nucleotide polymorphisms in the 10-year risk prediction of incident coronary heart disease: the Rotterdam Study.

    • Paul S de Vries, Maryam Kavousi, Symen Ligthart, André G Uitterlinden, Albert Hofman, Oscar H Franco, and Abbas Dehghan.
    • Department of Epidemiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    • Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr 1; 44 (2): 682-8.

    ObjectiveTo examine the incremental predictive value of genetic risk scores of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the 10-year risk prediction of incident CHD.MethodsIn 5899 subjects, we used 152 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with coronary artery disease by the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D consortium to construct three weighted genetic risk scores: (i) GRS(gws) based on 49 genome-wide significant SNPs; (ii) GRS(fdr) based on 103 suggestively associated SNPs; and (iii) GRS(all) based on all 152 SNPs. We examined the changes in discrimination and reclassification of incident CHD when adding the genetic risk scores to models including traditional risk factors. We repeated the analysis for prevalent CHD.ResultsThe genetic risk scores were associated with incident CHD despite adjustment for traditional risk factors and family history: participants had a 13% higher rate of CHD per standard deviation increase in GRS(all). GRS(all )improved the C-statistic by 0.006 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000, 0.013] beyond age and sex, 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.008) beyond traditional risk factors and 0.003 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.007) beyond traditional risk factors and family history. The genetic risk scores did not improve reclassification. GRS(all) strongly improved both discrimination and reclassification of prevalent CHD, even beyond traditional risk factors and family history, with a C-statistic improvement of 0.009 (0.003, 0.015).ConclusionsAlthough the genetic risk scores based on 152 SNPs were associated with incident CHD, they did not improve risk prediction. This discrepancy may be the result of SNP discovery for prevalent rather than incident CHD, since the SNPs do improve prediction for prevalent disease.© The Author 2015; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.