• B Seeliger, K Stahl, and Sascha David.
• Klinik für Pneumologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
• Internist (Berl). 2020 Oct 1; 61 (10): 1010-1016.

BackgroundDespite ongoing development, mortality in sepsis remains considerable. Various techniques for extracorporeal cytokine removal have been described, but evidence remains conflicting.ObjectivesThe aim of this article is to summarize currently used extracorporeal blood purification techniques and their evidence.MethodsNon-systematic literature review RESULTS: There are currently various blood purification techniques used with different levels of evidence regarding cytokine removal, vasopressor sparing effects and reduction of mortality, including high-volume dialysis with and without high cut-off filters, special adsorption filters (including CytoSorb®, CytoSorbents Europe, Berlin, Germany, and polymyxin‑B filters). There is development regarding therapeutic plasma exchange. For some blood purification techniques such as combined plasma filtration and adsorption, multicentric randomized studies found a negative effect on survival.ConclusionsDespite a theoretical rationale, the use of blood purification methods cannot be recommended for sepsis patients due to the lack of evidence of their efficacy. Heterogeneous inflammatory responses in sepsis render conduction of larger trials difficult. Thus, future studies should cautiously identify appropriate sepsis subtypes to be included. Available techniques should be chosen as individualized complementary treatments and not as competing systems.

10 keywords...

hide…