-
Review Meta Analysis
The efficacy and safety of epinephrine for postoperative bleeding in total joint arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
- Yanbin Teng, Jianxiong Ma, Xinlong Ma, Ying Wang, Bin Lu, and Chaowei Guo.
- Biomechanics Labs of Orthopaedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, PR China.
- Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr 1; 96 (17): e6763.
BackgroundTotal joint arthroplasty (TJA) usually results in postoperative bleeding. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) have been performed to evaluate the effects of epinephrine on postoperative bleeding after TJA. However, this remained controversial about the efficacy and safety of epinephrine for postoperative bleeding in TJA. The objective of our meta-analysis was to compare the overall effect and safety of epinephrine and placebo for postoperative bleeding in TJA.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify potentially relevant articles. RCTs or non-RCTs involving epinephrine and placebo for blood loss in total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty were included. Our study was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RevMan v5.3 was used to analyze the relevant data.ResultsFour RCTs and 1 non-RCT involving 646 participants met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled results from meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with control groups, epinephrine groups could significantly reduce the postoperative bleeding volume (mean difference [MD] = -168.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -272.37 to -64.47, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume between epinephrine and control groups (MD = -12.89, 95% CI: -53.45 to 27.69, P = 0.53). No significant difference was found between 2 groups in terms of postoperative hemoglobin loss (MD = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.66 to 0.10, P = 0.15). Compared with the control groups, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of postoperative transfusion rate in epinephrine groups (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64-1.15, P = 0.31). In addition, the results of the meta-analysis also indicated no significant difference in terms of the incidence rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) between 2 groups (RR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.05-1.64, P = 0.16).ConclusionThe meta-analysis showed that epinephrine could significantly reduce postoperative bleeding volume in TJA without increasing the incidence of DVT. However, there was no significant reduction in intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hemoglobin loss, and transfusion rate after the administration of epinephrine.LimitationsIn this study, a higher heterogeneity and a risk of selection bias may be present in postoperative hemoglobin loss. In addition, the sample size of the included studies was too small, so our findings need to be further validated with more high-quality and larger scale RCTs in the future.Systematic Review Registration NumberNone.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.