• Vikaesh Moorthy, Mun Chun Lai, LiowMing Han LincolnMHLDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore., Jerry Yongqiang Chen, Hee Nee Pang, Shi-Lu Chia, Ngai Nung Lo, and Seng Jin Yeo.
• Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. vikaeshmoorthy@yahoo.com.
• Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Oct 1; 29 (10): 3178-3185.

PurposeThe Attune® Knee System provides new instrumentation to achieve symmetric flexion/extension gaps in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is limited information on the optimal TKA technique using this system. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to determine which surgical technique results in better postoperative clinical outcomes after TKA using the contemporary Attune® Knee System: the measured resection or gap balancing technique.MethodsA prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 100 patients undergoing TKA using measured resection (n = 50) or gap balancing (n = 50) technique. The measured femoral sizer was used in the measured resection group, while the balanced femoral sizer was used in the gap balancing group. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months and 2 years post-surgery, using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Using weight-bearing coronal radiographs, the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), coronal femoral component angle (CFA), coronal tibial component angle (CTA) and joint line height were also evaluated for each patient.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the functional scores or the proportion of patients from each group who were satisfied or had their expectations fulfilled at 6 months or 2 years post-surgery. There was also no significant difference in the number of patients who attained minimum clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively between the groups. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in the number of HKA outliers between the groups (p = 0.202). The postoperative CFA (p = 0.265) and CTA (p = 0.479) were similar between the groups. There was also no significant difference in the absolute change (p = 0.447) or proportion of outliers (p = 0.611) for joint line height between the groups.ConclusionBoth measured resection and gap balancing techniques resulted in comparable functional and quality of life outcomes up to 2 years post-surgery. Both techniques appear to be equally effective in achieving excellent outcomes with the Attune® Knee System.Level Of EvidenceI.© 2020. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

13 keywords...

hide…