-
Internal medicine journal · Feb 2022
Meta AnalysisDirect oral anticoagulants for cancer associated venous thromboembolisms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Chinthaka B Samaranayake, James Anderson, Colm McCabe, Syeda Farah Zahir, W UphamJohnJhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0017-3433Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia., and Gregory Keir.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Intern Med J. 2022 Feb 1; 52 (2): 272-281.
BackgroundSeveral recent randomised controlled trials (RCT) have investigated the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in the treatment of malignancy-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).AimsThis meta-analysis combines all RCT data to determine the risks of recurrent VTE and bleeding with DOAC in patients with malignancy-associated VTE compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).MethodsThe study followed PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to 1 April 2020. References of reviews and relevant conference proceedings were searched by hand. Two authors independently evaluated study eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Direct and indirect meta-analyses were performed.ResultsIn four RCT with low risk of bias (2907 patients), high certainty evidence suggested that DOAC had a 37% reduction in risk of recurrent VTE compared with LMWH (direct pooled risk ratio (RR) 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.91; I2 = 28%). No significant difference was observed in the risk of major bleeding with DOAC compared with LMWH (RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.83-2.07; I2 = 22%; moderate certainty evidence), including in patients in gastrointestinal and genitourinary malignancy. An increased risk of combined major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding was seen with DOAC (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.09-2.12; I2 = 51%; low certainty evidence). Apixaban had the highest probability of being ranked the most effective and least bleeding risk among the DOAC.ConclusionDOAC are effective in treating malignancy associated VTE; however, caution is required in patients with high risk of bleeding. Apixaban had lower risk of bleeding compared to other DOAC in this population.© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.