• Radiology · Jul 2019

    Iodine Maps from Subtraction CT or Dual-Energy CT to Detect Pulmonary Emboli with CT Angiography: A Multiple-Observer Study.

    • Dagmar Grob, Ewoud Smit, Jip Prince, Jakob Kist, Lauran Stöger, Bram Geurts, Miranda M Snoeren, Rogier van Dijk, Luuk J Oostveen, Mathias Prokop, Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop, Ioannis Sechopoulos, and Moniqu... more e Brink. less
    • From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands (D.G., E.S., B.G., M.M.S., L.L.O., M.P., I.S., M.B.); and D... more epartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (J.P., J.K., L.S., R.v.D., C.M.S.P.). less
    • Radiology. 2019 Jul 1; 292 (1): 197-205.

    AbstractBackground Dual-energy CT iodine maps are used to detect pulmonary embolism (PE) with CT angiography but require dedicated hardware. Subtraction CT, a software-only solution, results in iodine maps with high contrast-to-noise ratios. Purpose To compare the use of subtraction CT versus dual-energy CT iodine maps to CT angiography for PE detection. Materials and Methods In this prospective study ( https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02890706), 274 participants suspected of having PE underwent precontrast CT followed by contrast material-enhanced dual-energy CT angiography between July 2016 and April 2017. Iodine maps from dual-energy CT were derived. Subtraction maps (contrast-enhanced CT minus precontrast CT) were calculated after motion correction. Truth was established by expert consensus. A total of 75 randomly selected participants with and without PE (1:1 ratio) were evaluated by three radiologists and six radiology residents (blinded to final diagnosis) for the presence of PE using three types of CT: CT angiography alone, dual-energy CT, and subtraction CT. The partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the clinically relevant specificity region (maximum partial AUC, 0.11) was compared by using multireader multicase variance. A P value less than or equal to .025 was considered indicative of a significant difference due to multiple comparisons. Results There were 35 men and 40 women in the reader study (mean age, 63 years ± 12 [standard deviation]). The pooled sensitivities were not different (P ≥ .31 among techniques) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 67%, 89% for CT angiography; 72%, 91% for dual-energy CT; 70%, 91% for subtraction CT). However, pooled specificity was higher for subtraction CT (95% CI: 100%, 100%) than for CT angiography (95% CI: 89%, 97%) or dual-energy CT (95% CI: 89%, 98%) (P < .001). Partial AUCs for the average observer improved equally when adding iodine maps (subtraction CT [0.093] vs CT angiography [0.088], P = .03; dual-energy CT [0.094] vs CT angiography, P = .01; dual-energy CT vs subtraction CT, P = .68). Average reading times were equivalent (range, 97-101 seconds; P ≥ .41) among techniques. Conclusion Subtraction CT iodine maps had greater specificity than CT angiography alone in pulmonary embolism detection. Subtraction CT had comparable diagnostic performance to that of dual-energy CT, without the need for dedicated hardware. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.