• Br J Anaesth · Dec 2020

    Multicenter Study

    Epidemiology and outcome of patients admitted to intensive care after anaphylaxis in France: a retrospective multicentre study.

    • Philippe Guerci, Charles Tacquard, Laura Chenard, David Millard, Lila Soufir, Jean-Marc Malinovsky, Matthias Garot, Jean-Marc Lalot, Guillaume Besch, Guillaume Louis, Laurie-Anne Thion, Claire Charpentier, Antoine Kimmoun, Marc Danguy Des Déserts, Serge Carreira, Gaetan Plantefeve, Emmanuel Novy, Paul Abraham, Paul-Michel Mertes, and Societe Francaise d'Anesthesie et Reanimation (SFAR) Research Network.
    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, University Hospital of Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; INSERM U1116, Groupe Choc, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France. Electronic address: phil.guerci@gmail.com.
    • Br J Anaesth. 2020 Dec 1; 125 (6): 1025-1033.

    BackgroundFew data are available on patients who have experienced anaphylaxis and were admitted to ICUs. The purpose of this observational study was to describe the epidemiology and management of these patients.MethodsThis was a multicentre retrospective study carried out in 23 French ICUs between 2012 and 2017. All patients who suffered anaphylaxis and were transferred to an ICU were included. Data were collected using an electronic database after approval by an ethics committee.ResultsA total of 339 patients were included, and 17 (5%) died secondary to anaphylaxis. The main triggers were drugs (77%), contrast media (11%), and food (7%). Epinephrine was administered before ICU admission in 88% of patients with Grade III anaphylaxis and 100% of patients with Grade IV anaphylaxis. Most patients with Grades III and IV anaphylaxes did not receive the recommended dose of i.v. fluid of 30 ml kg-1 within the first 4 h of ICU admission. The time to epinephrine administration was not statistically different between survivors and non-survivors, but non-survivors received a higher dose of epinephrine (median: 5 [3-10] vs 3 [2-7] mg; P<0.0001), which suggests that some forms of anaphylactic shock may be resistant to epinephrine. In multivariate analysis, only lactate concentration at ICU admission was a predictor of death (odds ratio: 1.47 [1.15-1.88]; P=0.002).ConclusionsLactate concentration at ICU admission appeared to be the most reliable criterion for assessing prognosis. Epinephrine is widely used during anaphylaxis, but the volume of fluid resuscitation was consistently lower than recommended.Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT04290507.Copyright © 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.