• M Yilmaz, Y A Bayazit, I Erbagci, and S Pençe.
• Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Kolejtepe, Gaziantep, Turkey.
• J. Neurol. Sci. 2001 Mar 1; 184 (2): 139-41.

ObjectiveTo assess the visual evoked potential (VEP) changes in migraines with and without aura.Study DesignA clinical study in which the VEP results of 45 migraineurs (study group) and 22 healthy volunteers (control group) were compared. Of 45 migraineurs, 29 had migraine with aura (MA) and 16 had migraine without aura (MOA), and they were examined both during and between the migraine attacks.MethodsThe patients and healthy controls underwent VEP assessment. On VEP recording, mono-ocular stimulation was performed by means of the pattern reversal check board. The latencies of N1, P1 and N2, and the N1--P1 amplitude were noted. The following comparisons were made between NI, P1 and N2 latencies and N1--P1 amplitudes of the migraine and control groups; during and between attack the VEP results of the patients with MA and MOA.ResultsThe VEP results of the migraineurs and healthy controls were similar (P>0.05). The during attack results of MA, during and between attack results of MOA, and the results of the control group were also similar (P>0.05). N2 latency significantly elongated in patients with MA in the attack free period than it was during the attack (P=0.01), and was also longer than it was in the control group (P=0.01).ConclusionsThere is involvement of the visual pathway in MA rather than MOA, and differentiation between these subtypes of the migraine disease may be performed on the basis of VEP findings manifesting by the prolongation of the N2 wave latency. This contention should be confirmed by further studies.

18 keywords...

hide…