• J Am Soc Echocardiogr · Jun 2005

    Comparative Study Controlled Clinical Trial

    Transesophageal echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation therapy.

    • Nikolaus Jander, Jan Minners, Thomas Arentz, Lothar Görnandt, Rudolf Fürmaier, Dietrich Kalusche, and Franz Josef Neumann.
    • Herz-Zentrum, Bad Krozingen, Germany. nikolaus.jander@herzzentrum.de
    • J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Jun 1; 18 (6): 654-9.

    ObjectiveDoppler-derived flow velocity measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may overestimate pulmonary vein stenosis. We hypothesized that combining peak velocity with a stenotic flow pattern improves diagnosis compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsTEE and MRI were performed in 44 patients 19 +/- 11 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pulmonary vein stenosis was defined by a peak velocity of 110 cm/s or more plus a stenotic flow pattern (turbulence and reduced flow variation) on TEE and a lumen reduction of more than 50% on MRI.ResultsIn all, 175 pulmonary veins were studied. MRI showed 7 cases of pulmonary vein stenosis that were correctly identified by TEE. In addition, TEE criteria for pulmonary vein stenosis were met in 4 pulmonary veins that did not show obstruction on MRI. In all, 5 pulmonary veins with normal appearance on MRI had peak velocity of 110 cm/s or more with normal flow pattern.ConclusionsTEE Doppler measurements can be reliably used to detect or exclude significant pulmonary vein stenosis if the diagnosis is restricted to a combination of elevated peak velocity (> or = 110 cm/s) with turbulence and little flow variation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.