• Chuancheng Li, Hongqiang An, Jiahao Wang, Zhenyuan Jiang, Tianqi Zhang, and Qing Huo.
• First College of Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18; 99 (38): e22265.

BackgroundIn recent years, the incidence of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been on the rise. However, the existing therapy of PD cannot fundamentally treat the disease. Meanwhile, the complementary and alternative therapies of PD have played a positive role in the treatment of PD. Traditional meta-analysis was only able to compare 2 interventions, while the efficacy and safety of many complementary and alternative therapies were not comparable. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of different complementary and alternative therapies through network meta-analysis (NMA).MethodsA comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials of complementary and alternative therapies for PD, as well as trials currently in progress, will be conducted until August 2020. Literature and data extraction were independently completed by two researchers. Through the meta-analysis of pairwise comparison and Bayesian NMA, all evidences are comprehensively evaluated. Use STATA15.0 and WinBUGS1.4.3 software for data processing and analysis, and use grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluation to classify the quality of evidence in the NMA.ResultsThe aim of this study is to obtain a ranking of efficacy and safety of different complementary and alternative therapies for PD.ConclusionComplementary and alternative therapies for PD have positive significance in improving the symptoms of PD, and can provide evidence support for clinicians and patients.Inplasy Registration NumberINPLASY202080079.

13 keywords...

hide…