• Alexander Ellwein, Helmut Lill, Rony-Orijit DeyHazra, Tomas Smith, and Jan Christoph Katthagen.
• Department for Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, DIAKOVERE Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Straße 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany. alexander.ellwein@diakovere.de.
• Int Orthop. 2019 Dec 1; 43 (12): 2807-2815.

PurposeTension band wiring remains a common treatment for patella fractures, but complication rates are high, with unsatisfactory results. The purpose of this observation study was to evaluate clinical results and complication rates of a novel patella locking plate fixation.MethodsTwenty patients (mean age, 59.2 ± 18 years) with displaced patella fractures were prospectively enrolled. Range of motion, knee scores (Tegner, Lysholm, Kujala), complications, and revision surgeries were assessed six weeks, six months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery. Results were compared to the situation before trauma in regards to the time of follow-up using a paired sample t test.ResultsAccording to the OTA classification, the fractures were classified as follows: one A1, four C1, six C2, and nine C3. Range of motion improved from 121° after six weeks to 140°, 141°, and 143° within the follow-up period. While the Tegner, Lysholm, and Kujala scores were 4.1/97/97, respectively, before trauma, they improved from 2.6/80/89 to 3.6/94/89, 3.7/95/94, and 4.1/97/97 within the follow-up period. Three patients had a complication (15%): one fracture dislocation, one reactive bursitis, and one renewed fracture. Four patients reported discomfort or anterior knee pain especially when kneeling on the implant.ConclusionsThe patella locking plate is a safe and effective treatment for patella fractures, including comminuted fractures. Function can be restored within six months after surgery, and the complication rate is low. Nonetheless, the implant can cause discomfort or anterior knee pain especially when kneeling, which can necessitate an implant removal.

27 keywords...

hide…