• Oussama Daou, Hadrien Winiszewski, Guillaume Besch, Sebastien Pili-Floury, François Belon, Benoit Guillon, Tania Marx, Sidney Chocron, Gilles Capellier, Andrea Perrotti, and Gaël Piton.
• Department of cardiology, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Australia.
• J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar 1; 12 (3): 849-857.

BackgroundThere is uncertainty about best selection criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest. We aimed to identify factors associated with a favorable neurological outcome, and to build a score calculable at the time of ECMO insertion predicting the prognosis.MethodsRetrospective analysis of all patients who underwent eCPR between 2010 and 2017 in a single university hospital. Primary end point was survival with favorable neurological outcome at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge defined as a Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2.ResultsOverall low-flow time of the 113 included patients was 84 [55-122] minutes. Eighteen patients (16%) survived with a favorable neurological outcome. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial shockable rhythm, and arterial blood pH at the time of eCPR implantation ≥7.0, were independent predictors of survival with favorable neurological outcome. All of the patients presenting with both non-shockable rhythm and pH <7.0 at the time of eCPR implantation died in the ICU.ConclusionsAt the time of eCPR start, only initial shockable rhythm and arterial pH ≥7.0 predicted neurological outcome. A selection of the patients who might benefit from eCPR, based upon initial rhythm and arterial pH rather than on low flow time, should be further evaluated.2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

3 keywords...

hide…