-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ 5-D) and the SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.
- J Tidermark, G Bergström, O Svensson, H Törnkvist, and S Ponzer.
- Department of Orthopedics at Stockholm Söder Hospital, Sweden. jan.tidermark@ortoped.sos.sll.se
- Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec 1; 12 (8): 1069-79.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) instruments, i.e. their ability to capture clinically important changes, in elderly patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture. The study was part of a prospective randomised study comparing two different surgical procedures, internal fixation (IF) and total hip replacement (THP).SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsA total of 110 patients, mean age 80 years with an acute displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden III and IV). The inclusion criteria were age > or = 70, absence of severe cognitive dysfunction, independent living status and independent walking capability.InterventionThe patients were randomised to IF or to a THR.Main Outcome MeasurementsHealth-related quality of life according to EQ-5D and SF-36. Responsiveness measured by the ability of the EQ-5D and the SF-36 to detect clinically relevant differences in the study population according to an external criterion (EC) for outcome (good or less good clinical outcome). Responsiveness was measured in terms of change scores, standardised effect size (SES) and standardised response mean (SRM).ResultsThe rated prefracture EQ-5D(index) scores and SF-36 scores showed good correspondence with the scores of age-matched Swedish reference populations. The relationship between the EC and EQ-5D(index) score and the SF-36 global score showed significant differences in both comparisons (p < 0.001). The responsiveness expressed with the SES and SRM were large for both the EQ-5D (1.37 and 0.90, respectively) and for the SF-36 global score (0.89 and 0.82, respectively). The correlation between the change scores for the SF-36 global score and the EQ-5D was 0.39 (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe results showed high responsiveness for both the EQ-5D and the SF-36, indicating that both instruments are suitable for use as outcome measures in clinical trials in elderly hip fracture patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.