• Audrey Hébert, Marie-Pier Boucher, Chantal Guimont, and Matthew Weiss.
• Department of Pediatrics, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec.
• Paed Child Healt Can. 2017 Mar 1; 22 (1): 13-16.

Background And ObjectivesA majority of children presenting with sepsis do not receive adequate fluid resuscitation and have a delay in antibiotic administration despite recommendations from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of measuring a complete set of five vital signs in the emergency department (ED) with recognition and treatment of septic children presenting to the ED.MethodsRecords of 218 patients aged 1 month to 17 years treated between February 2011 and December 2011 in a single academic centre with clinical criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock were retrospectively evaluated. The presence or absence of complete vital signs was analyzed in relation to timing of fluid resuscitation, and if antibiotics were given in the first hour of medical evaluation.ResultsSeventy-six per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured in the ED received fluid resuscitation in the first hour after medical evaluation as opposed to 61% of those who had an incomplete set of vital signs (P<0.04). Twenty per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured received antibiotics in the first hour as opposed to 9% in children who had fewer vital signs measured (P<0.02).ConclusionIn our study population, the measurement of all vital signs in the ED, including blood pressure, was associated with faster administration of antibiotics and improved compliance with existing fluid bolus recommendations, which may have been the result of better recognition of sepsis in children through vital signs measurement.

4 keywords...

hide…