• Jun Zhang, Feng Zhou, Xiaoxiang Ge, Xu Ran, Yeping Li, Si Chen, Xiaotong Dai, Dafang Chen, and Baoguo Jiang.
• Department of Neurology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
• Patient Prefer Adher. 2018 Jan 1; 12: 2527-2536.

Background And AimsPatient satisfaction is one of the important ways to measure the results of treatment and the quality of medical services. The purpose of the present study was to verify the reliability and validity of the indicator system for evaluating satisfaction of outpatients and inpatients in Chinese hospitals.MethodsThe study was based on the satisfaction questionnaire program of the national doctor- patient experience research center with data from 99,802 outpatients and 229,215 inpatients, collected in China between 2016 and 2017. We adopted exploratory factor analysis for validity analysis and the method of split-half reliability and Cronbach's α coefficient for reliability analysis.ResultsIn the validity analysis of the indicator system for outpatients, the factor loading was between 0.438 and 0.919, and the reliability was excellent. In the validity analysis of the indicator system for nonsurgical inpatients, the factor loading of the secondary indicators was between 0.417 and 0.75, and the reliability was excellent. In the validity analysis of the indicator system for surgical inpatients satisfaction, the factor loading of the secondary indicators range was 0.391-0.751, and the reliability was excellent.ConclusionThe indicator systems for evaluating satisfaction of outpatients, surgical inpatients and nonsurgical inpatients all have excellent reliability and good validity. They can be widely used for an outpatient and inpatient satisfaction questionnaire in Chinese hospitals.

4 keywords...

hide…