• Atencion primaria · Jan 2021

    The medication discrepancy detection service: A cost-effective multidisciplinary clinical approach.

    • Ainhoa Oñatibia-Astibia, Amaia Malet-Larrea, Amaia Mendizabal, Elena Valverde, Belen Larrañaga, Miguel Ángel Gastelurrutia, Martín Ezcurra, Leire Arbillaga, Begoña Calvo, and Estibaliz Goyenechea.
    • Official Pharmacist Association of Gipuzkoa, Prim 2, 20006 Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain; Pharmaceutical Technology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, P. Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria, Spain. Electronic address: ainhoaonatibia@redfarma.org.
    • Aten Primaria. 2021 Jan 1; 53 (1): 43-50.

    ObjectiveTo estimate the effectiveness of a Medication Discrepancy Detection Service (MDDS), a collaborative service between the community pharmacy and Primary Care.DesignNon-controlled before-and-after study.SettingBidasoa Integrated Healthcare Organisation, Gipuzkoa, Spain.ParticipantsThe service was provided by a multidisciplinary group of community pharmacists (CPs), general practitioners (GPs), and primary care pharmacists, to patients with discrepancies between their active medical charts and medicines that they were actually taking.OutcomesThe primary outcomes were the number of medicines, the type of discrepancy, and GPs' decisions. Secondary outcomes were time spent by CPs, emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and costs.ResultsThe MDDS was provided to 143 patients, and GPs resolved discrepancies for 126 patients. CPs identified 259 discrepancies, among which the main one was patients not taking medicines listed on their active medical charts (66.7%, n=152). The main GPs' decision was to withdraw the treatment (54.8%, n=125), which meant that the number of medicines per patient was reduced by 0.92 (9.12±3.82 vs. 8.20±3.81; p<.0001). The number of ED visits and hospital admissions per patient were reduced by 0.10 (0.61±.13 vs 0.52±0.91; p=.405 and 0.17 (0.33±0.66 vs. 0.16±0.42; p=.007), respectively. The cost per patient was reduced by €444.9 (€1003.3±2165.3 vs. €558.4±1273.0; p=.018).ConclusionThe MDDS resulted in a reduction in the number of medicines per patients and number of hospital admissions, and the service was associated with affordable, cost-effective ratios.Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…