-
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med · Dec 2018
Randomized Controlled TrialEfficacy of two brief cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation programs for chronic neck pain: results of a randomized controlled pilot study.
- Marco Monticone, Emilia Ambrosini, Howard Vernon, Barbara Rocca, Gabriele Finco, Calogero Foti, and Simona Ferrante.
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy - marco.monticone@unica.it.
- Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Dec 1; 54 (6): 890-899.
BackgroundCurrent models of pain behavior suggest that kinesiophobia prevents the reacquisition of normal function, promotes the development of maladaptive coping strategies, and contributes to the disability associated with chronic neck pain (NP).AimComparing two brief cognitive-behavioral programs aimed at managing kinesiophobia to understand which one induces better short-term improvements in disability, fear of movement, catastrophizing, adaptive coping strategies, quality of life (QoL), and pain intensity of chronic NP.DesignPilot, randomized, controlled trial, 3-months follow-up.SettingOutpatients.PopulationSubjects with chronic NP.MethodsThe population was randomized into two groups: group A (N.=15) underwent four sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) based on the NeckPix© (1-week duration); group B (N.=15) received four sessions of CBT based on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) (1-week duration). Afterwards, both groups attended 10 sessions of multimodal exercises (5-week duration). Primary measure: Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary measures: NeckPix©, TSK, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, EuroQol-Five Dimensions, and pain intensity Numerical Rating Scale.StatisticsLinear mixed model analyses for repeated measures for each outcome measure to evaluate changes over time and between group.ResultsA significant effect of time was found for all outcomes, while no outcomes showed group and/or interaction effects. No changes were found in terms of NDI at the end of CBT, while a significant improvement of about 13 points was found for both groups at the end of the motor training (P=0.001). Similarly, in terms of quality of life there was no change after the CBT program, and a significant change at the end of the motor training, with a partial loss at follow-up. From CBT sessions to follow-up both groups showed a progressive reduction in kinesiophobia, with each group achieving a bigger change in the specific scale used for the CBT program.ConclusionsTwo brief cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation programs based on different methodologies of managing fear-avoidance beliefs induced similar short-term improvements in subjects with chronic NP. Clinically significant changes in terms of disability were found in both groups only at the end of a 5-week motor training, regardless of the cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation program previously administrated.Clinical Rehabilitation ImpactTreatment of chronic NP requires cognitive modifications closely linked to physical performances in order to achieve mental adjustments and guarantee cognitive-behavioral as well as motor lasting changes.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.