• Medicina · Jan 2007

    Comparative Study

    [Comparison of methods for evaluating renal function (Data of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital in 2006)].

    • Vytautas Kuzminskis, Inga Skarupskiene, Inga Arūne Bumblyte, Zydrūne Kardauskaite, and Jurgita Uogintaite.
    • Department of Nephrology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania.
    • Medicina (Kaunas). 2007 Jan 1; 43 Suppl 1: 46-51.

    AbstractCockcroft-Gault formula and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation are widely used as indirect estimates of renal function. The precision and reliability of these formulas regarding kidney function are still discussed. The aim of our study was to evaluate glomerular filtration rate by different methods and compare the results. Data on patients in whom renal function was evaluated at the Clinic of Nephrology of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital in 2006 are presented in this article. Glomerular filtration rate was assessed based on 24-hour endogenous creatinine clearance and calculated using three formulas: Cockcroft-Gault, abbreviated MDRD, and complete MDRD. Blood serum creatinine level was measured by the standardized Jaffe assay. Glomerular filtration rate was examined in 125 patients. Their mean age was 58.07+/-18.962 years. The mean endogenous creatinine clearance was 31.1287+/-31.14 783 mL/min. The mean glomerular filtration rate calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula was 34.1220+/-29.02 967 mL/min, by abbreviated MDRD formula was 29.8212+/-25.83 866 mL/min/1.73 m2, and by complete MDRD formula was 28.6884+/-24.99 353 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was no statistically significant difference in mean glomerular filtration rates estimated using all methods in the evaluation of kidney function. When the reliability of formulas was analyzed depending on each stage of chronic kidney disease, it was found that Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas, in contrast to endogenous creatinine clearance, did not precisely reflect kidney function in stages 1 and 2 of chronic kidney disease. Estimates by Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas correctly showed decreased kidney function in stages 3 and 4 of chronic kidney disease. Formulas were not reliable, in contrast to endogenous creatinine clearance, when patients were in end-stage chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS. Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas are best for the evaluation of moderate degree of renal insufficiency, and in early stage of chronic kidney disease, underestimation of glomerular filtration rate is possible by using formulas. Estimates of glomerular filtration rate based on formulas are higher as compared to endogenous creatinine clearance measurements in end-stage chronic kidney disease.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.