• Andrew Healey, Amanda van Beinum, Laura Hornby, Lindsay C Wilson, Sylvain Bédard, Heather Berrigan, Diana Brodrecht, Clay Gillrie, Thomas Shing, Jonathan Towers, Everad Tilokee, and Sam D Shemie.
• Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. ahealeymd@gmail.com.
• Can J Anaesth. 2020 Dec 1; 67 (12): 173817481738-1748.

PurposeHeart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome patient partner engagement resulting in mutually beneficial policy development in this complex area.MethodsA wide-ranging process for involving patient partners in this area included pre-meeting education, in-meeting expert support, full participation and permission to step back if desired, and post-meeting debriefing. Following the meeting, a questionnaire was used to guide a debrief discussion with patient partners and steering committee members who co-authored this paper.ResultsFive key themes arose that echoed the sentiments and contributions made by patient partners, including: 1) a strong desire to improve the system, 2) gratitude and honour, 3) expert support and process, 4) simplification of complex concepts, and 5) mutual benefit expressed by patient partners and healthcare professionals.ConclusionDespite the complexity of the content and the emotionally sensitive nature of discussions around deceased organ donation, a well-planned strategy to involve patient partners is important, impactful, and central to the process. This suggests a broad interprofessional audience can engage with properly prepared and supported patient partners to strengthen and focus dialogue and outputs in the development of health policy in the donation and transplant sector.

11 keywords...

hide…