• Pain physician · Sep 2020

    Interventional Pain Management for Cancer Pain: An Analysis of Outcomes and Predictors of Clinical Response.

    • Uri Hochberg, Amir Minerbi, Louis-Martin Boucher, and Jordi Perez.
    • Institute of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Cancer Pain Clinic, Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
    • Pain Physician. 2020 Sep 1; 23 (5): E451-E460.

    BackgroundInterventional procedures are offered routinely to patients seen in McGill University's interdisciplinary cancer pain management program. However, publications on these procedures are scarce, making it difficult to predict which patients may benefit from them.ObjectivesWe hypothesized that interventional pain procedures offered to cancer patients could provide relief of pain as well as other symptoms. Furthermore, some variables may predict the efficacy of such procedures.Study DesignWe conducted a retrospective chart review of interventional pain management procedures.SettingThe procedures reviewed were conducted at the Cancer Pain Program and performed at the interventional suites of the McGill University Health Centre.MethodsThe retrospective chart review included interventional pain management procedures performed between June 2015 and March 2017. Demographic data, details about the underlying cancer and about the procedure and peripTrocedural patients' reported outcomes were recorded for analysis.ResultsEighty-two of 126 procedures were included for analysis. Most patients presented with metastatic disease (75%). Eighty percent of the patients reported pain relief, with the average pain severity decreasing by more than 2 points on a 0-to-10 Numeric Rating Scale for pain (from 6.5 of 10 to 4.2 of 10). Forty-three percent of patients were considered responders (>= 50% pain relief). Responders also reported a significant decrease in fatigue, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, and improved well-being. Among responders, average daily opioid use decreased significantly, by 60% on average. None of the analyzed variables correlated with the response; however, psychosocial variables like anxiety and depression showed a nonsignificant trend towards predicting procedure failure.LimitationsThe core limitations of this study are its size and retrospective nature.ConclusionsIn this cohort of cancer pain patients, interventional cancer pain procedures provided effective pain relief and other benefits, including pain relief, reduced burden of symptoms, and reduction of opioid intake, while demonstrating a favorable safety profile. Patients with poorer ratings of depression and fatigue derived less benefit from procedures, suggesting that offering such procedures as part of patients' treatment plan would be sensible, rather than leaving interventions for later stages.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…